of the International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning , Cambridge , MA

نویسندگان

  • Wolfgang Nejdl
  • Markus Banagl
چکیده

The AGM rationality postulates for belief revision play an important role in the formal-ization of subjunctive queries over knowledge bases. However, the well known triviality results by GG ardenfors in connection with the Ramsey Test make deening a query semantics corresponding to these rationality postulates a diicult task. While existing approaches avoid the triviality results by restricting the postulates in certain ways, we show that an exact translation into a query semantics is possible. The resulting semantics allows for the rst time the integration of subjunctive queries evaluated according to a revision semantics corresponding to the AGM rationality postulates with an update operator corresponding to the update semantics formalized by Katsuno, Mendelzon and Grahne. Additionally, the query semantics extends usual conditional implication by deening the concepts of possibility and necessity relative to a knowledge base.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Organization of Gatekeeping and Mental Framework in the System of Representation and Hierarchical Relational Structures of the Modern Society

Critical discourse analysis as a type of social practice reveals how linguistic choices enable speakers to manipulate the realizations of agency and power in the representation of action.The present study examines the relationship between language and ideology and explores how such a relationship is represented in the analysis of spoken text and to show how declarative knowledge, beliefs, attit...

متن کامل

Causality and the Qualification Problem

In formal theories for reasoning about actions, the qualification problem denotes the problem to account for the many conditions which, albeit being unlikely to occur, may prevent the successful execution of an action. By a simple counter-example in the spirit of the well-known Yale Shooting scenario, we show that the common straightforward approach of globally minimizing such abnormal disquali...

متن کامل

A novel model of clinical reasoning: Cognitive zipper model

Introduction: Clinical reasoning is a vital aspect of physiciancompetence. It has been the subject of academic research fordecades, and various models of clinical reasoning have beenproposed. The aim of the present study was to develop a theoreticalmodel of clinical reasoning.Methods: To conduct our study, we applied the process of theorysynthesis in accordan...

متن کامل

A Quantum Logic of Down Below

ed Quantum Formalism to Cognition. In M.H. Bickhard and R. Campbell,editors, Mind in Interaction. John Benjamins: Amsterdam, 2005.[Barndorff-Nielsen et al., 2003] O.E. Barndorff-Nielsen, R.D. Gill, and P.E Jupp. On quantum statistical inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 65(4):775–816,2003.[Barwise and Seligman, 1997] J. Barwise and J. Seligman. Information flow:...

متن کامل

Knowledge representation and commonsense reasoning: Reviews of four books

Ronald J. Brachman, Hector J. Levesque, Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann, ISBN 1558609326, 2004, 381 pages. Raymond Reiter, Knowledge in Action: Logical Foundations for Specifying and Implementing Dynamical Systems, MIT Press, ISBN 0262182181, 2001, 448 pages. Erik T. Mueller, Commonsense Reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann, ISBN 0123693888, 2006, 432 pages. Chitta Baral, Knowledg...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1992